We Cope, Not Hope (results)

Disease as an adverse interruption of life is the prevalent interpretation of chronic pain conditions. But there are different ways to cope with pain, and there are different ways to regulate emotions associated with chronic diseases. Because most patients with chronic conditions are unable to ‘solve’ our persisting pain by ourselves (in terms of recovery or repair) and to find distance to negative emotions associated with pain, we have to find strategies to adapt to a long-lasting course of illness.

We have to find ways to maintain physical, emotional and spiritual health in spite of often long-lasting courses. Thus, our coping with chronic pain is an ongoing process which includes appraisals of stress, cognitive, behavioural, and emotional coping responses, and subsequent reappraisals of stress.

One of the most frequently used concept on adaptation strategies for patients with chronic pain diseases differentiates active and passive coping:

  • Active coping (i.e., problem solving, including collecting information and refocusing on the problem, or regulation of emotion by focusing attention on the emotional response aroused by the stressor) is associated with less pain, less depression, less functional impairment, and higher general self-efficacy;
  • Passive coping (i.e., avoidance and escape) is correlated with reports of greater depression, greater pain and flare-up activity, greater functional impairment, and lower general self-efficacy.

Although the importance of decreasing maladaptive and encouraging adaptive coping responses is emphasized by innovative treatment programs for chronic pain (if you can get in!), one nevertheless has to ask which adaptive coping strategies were of relevance for the patients.

I asked the same question of you: Which of the following coping strategies best describes the way you cope with your chronic pain?

The answers (so you don’t have to return to the poll) were:

  • Trust in Divine Help in response to disease addresses non-organized intrinsic religiosity as an external transcendent resource to cope (i.e., trust in a higher power which carries through; strong belief that God will help; faith is a strong hold, even in hard times; pray to become healthy again; live in accordance with religious convictions).
  • Trust in Medical Help addresses patients’ reliance on an external medical source of health control (i.e., trust in the therapeutic potentials of modern medicine, take prescribed medication, follow advice of medical practitioners, full confidence in doctors and therapists).
  • Search for Information and Alternative Help refers to external sources providing additional information or alternative help (i.e., thoroughly informed about disease; get thorough information how to become healthy again; find people who can help; search for alternative ways of healing).
  • Conscious Way of Living addresses cognitive and behavioural strategies in terms of internal powers and virtues (i.e., healthy diet; physical fitness; living consciously; keep away harmful influences; change life to get well).
  • Positive Attitudes refers to internal cognitive and behavioural strategies (i.e., realization of shelved dreams and wishes; resolving cumbering situations of the past; take life in own hands; doing all that what pleases; positive thinking; avoiding thinking at illness).
  • Reappraisal: Illness as Chance addresses a reappraisal attitude referring to cognitive processes of life reflection (i.e., reflect on what is essential in life; illness has meaning; illness as a chance for development; appreciation of life because of illness).
  • Escape from illness (i.e., fear what illness will bring; would like to run away from illness; when I wake up, I don’t know how to face the day)

The study, which started all of this, had 579 participants – we had 239 (not too bad). The study also asked demographic type questions but I decided not to make it too long a poll so we could have more answers.

From highest reliance to lowest here are the results from both the study and our poll:


We (as a group) seem to be much more aggressive, active participants in the search for sufficient condition management.


Most study patients tended to externalize the process of disease management, i.e., the chronic pain disease was regarded as an adverse interruption of life, and patients called experts for help (i.e., medical doctors or therapists), and followed their advice or relied on the effects of prescribed remedies, which alone is a rather passive strategy. However, if you add (internal) cognitive-behavioural changes (i.e., patients may change distinct aspects of their life, try to become more consciously, healthy, physically fit, use distinct diets etc) or try to think positive (resolve cumbering situations of past, realize shelved dreams and wishes etc.) – both are active strategies.

In face of an insufficient manageability of chronic pain, some patients may call upon ‘more powerful’ external others (i.e., Trust in Divine Help), because the conventional resources of help seem to be (subjectively) exhausted.

In general, both groups relied on external powerful sources to control their disease (i.e., Trust in Medical Help; Search for Information and Alternative Help), but also on internal powers and virtues (i.e., Conscious Way of Living; Positive Attitudes).

In contrast, Trust in Divine Help as an external transcendent source and Reappraisal: Illness as Chance as an internal (cognitive) strategy were valued moderately.

Escape from Illness (which is not regarded as an adaptive coping strategy) was highly associated with depressive disorders.

The researchers came to the conclusion that to restore a sense of self-control over pain as well as the conviction that you are not necessarily disabled by disease and that pain is not necessarily a sign of damage is a major task in patient care. Changing negative/maladaptive illness interpretations and depressive or avoidance coping by means of an intervention and encouraging social support by means of patient support groups may at least improve quality of life.

Apart from effective pain management, a comprehensive approach is needed which enhances the psycho-spiritual well-being, i.e. self-awareness, coping and adjusting effectively with stress, relationships, sense of faith, sense of empowerment and confidence, and living with meaning and hope.

Further studies are required (of course!), particularly longitudinal studies to measure changes in the weighting of adaptive coping strategies and interpretations of disease with respect to pain intensity, and comprehensive intervention programs.


F.Y.I. – The utilization of the different adaptive coping strategies did not significantly differ with respect to gender, while the educational level had a small impact on Trust in Medical Help, which was the highest in patients with a lower educational level. Age had a significant impact on Trust in Divine Help, Trust in Medical Help and Conscious Way of Living. The duration of the condition had no significant impact on the adaptive coping strategies.

An obvious result showed that patients from the outpatient clinic had significantly higher scores for Trust in Medical Help and Escape from Illness than patients from the rehabilitation clinic or patients attending the mind-body program, and were also in Search for Information and Alternative Help. This may indicate higher need for external help.